Sears Could Disrupt Throwaway Tech Culture

It's funny the timing of this article.  I was just talking with my wife about Sears and how it seems they have no future, it's only a matter of time before the Sears retail store as we know it will no longer exist.  Then to read a headline about Sears disrupting?  Heck ya I'm interested.

The company has launched a Seattle office, and recruited retail tech execs to help it get a handle on the data it has amassed from the 40,000+ daily service queries its Home Services group collects on washing machines, refrigerators, and other appliances. It turns out that the industry average is that about 1 out of every 4 customers don’t get their appliance woes fixed on the first visit. 

“Each truck carries about 400 parts, yet those annual service calls require something like 168,000 different parts,” explained Arun Arora, the group’s president. “We’d have to have our 7,000 certified technicians driving semis around to anticipate them.”

"Big data" has so many applications and to see Sears trying to disrupt in a way that doesn't make headlines is impressive.  This kind of disruption, even though on the surface looks like a cost-savings initiative, can revolutionize the service of appliances.  Why does that matter?  Because loyalty is the name of the game.  If they make the experience of owning a machine better, even when it is getting old and needs some new life breathed into it, they can increase their base of loyal active customers.  

The more customers that are active with a company the more they will make.  If Sears can increase the number of loyal customers by offering a superior customer experience of ownership, they can drive more sales in other areas.  It is the process of rebuilding trust with a brand.  If I knew buying an oven will have a longer shelf-life and the company where I was buying it can make that happen, then it makes where I buy more interesting.  

So many times in the retail space it comes down to price.  Everyone sells ovens and mostly from the same manufacturers, so there is very little to differentiate.  The easiest rode to differentiation is price.  The problem is when competing on price, the business can never win.  They are not cultivating loyal customers, in fact they are probably selling to the exact wrong customer.  If a customer is only going to choose on price, they are by definition not loyal customers.  If Sears can differentiate beyond price and experience in the stores, they can grow their loyal database.  That's a big win.   

The Missing Connection Between Big Data and Great Insights for Data-Driven Marketers

Data-driven marketers today are wondering how they can gain insight from big data. The answer? The ability to change is the connection between big data and insight. Data-driven marketers today know that their roles are changing: 68% of marketers think that marketing has seen more changes in the last two years than it has in the past 50 years, according to a recent survey.  The changes are due to a renewed focus on customer experience within their jobs, and the need to use big data to improve that experience.

Customer Experience is the buzzword over the last 2 years, combine this with the other buzzword of "big data" and you can understand why 68% of marketers think marketing has changed so drastically the last couple of years.  I think what is causing all this change is how technology has shifted the paradigm of marketing.  

For many years marketers were able to call on plays from the same playbook and be very successful.  The technology was never really able to advance the playbook and very few companies were pushing the boundaries.  Today, marketing technology companies are driving the sea change, creating platforms which make creating authentic customer experiences possible on a large scale.  

Companies are having to tear up their playbook and turn their strategy on its head.  This goes well beyond just the marketing playbook.  Companies are having to start culture change throughout the organization as the customer experience goes well beyond just the marketing department.  As customers interact with all parts of organizations, there is little care of operational silos within companies.  

The biggest sea change is what Adobe refers to "marketing beyond marketing".  No longer can marketing leaders be focused on the message and bring in customers, only to wipe their hands after the customer starts engaging with the brand.  Marketers are learning they are the leaders of the customer experience renaissance.  Marketing is having to drive the experience of the customer throughout entire organizations, which is not a skill-set a traditional marketer has.  This change will be driving "big data" initiatives as marketers are learning to understand their customers in new and interesting ways.  

Yelp is Looking For Buyers

In reading the daily update on Stratechery by Ben Thompson, which I highly recommend, he discusses Yelp being on the market.  Yelp is definitely underperforming compared to other social network advertising platforms.  Their revenue is very small, $377 million in 2014 and the growth is not as large as it needs to be for a corporation the size of Yelp.  

What strikes me as interesting in the case of Yelp is their strategy.  Yesterday I commented on an article about strategy and how to assess if your strategy is valid.  I believe Yelp has a strategy that is destined to fail.  Yelp is running the same strategy as the market leaders, which is as an advertising platform.  

The issue I see with their strategy is it is not differentiated.  In fact, their offering is worse than the market leaders when it comes to their ad product.  One may argue their product is differentiated because if a customer is searching for example Mexican Restaurants, then as a Mexican Restaurant it can't get more targeted than an ad for someone looking for that kind of food in a small geographical area.  The problem with this is customers aren't looking for ads on Yelp, they are looking for advice.  An ad is the opposite of what they desire.

 I frequently hear in the tech community that Twitter doesn't understand its product.  They want the product to be something other than what it is.  I fear Yelp may be in the same boat.  Yelp is an aggregator of reviews, they are the trusted source of "where should I eat".  That trust comes from customers reviews.  

elp has the opportunity to differentiate their business.  Their strategy should be the opposite of the strengths of Google and Facebook.  

Loyalty

Yelp has a loyal customer base, however they do not take advantage of this.  Their product has not really changed much since its inception, especially in mobile.  With the advent of technologies, such as beacons, it surprises me that Yelp hasn't taken advantage of its loyal base and struck up deals with local businesses to do a loyalty program with Yelp.  Businesses rely on having great Yelp reviews and this can be parlayed into some kind of loyalty program with a beacon backbone that would identify if a customer was at the business and how much was spent using new location aware technologies.

Recommendation Engine

Because of the amount of data Yelp has it is surprising they haven't developed a more intuitive recommendation engine.  I am always looking for places that I would enjoy and it would be nice if an app told me where I should go and what I should order or what services I should buy.  Yelp is in such a unique position to deliver this.  

I believe they have the ability to enhance their product by allowing customers to rate something without writing a review.  This is something that doesn't have to count to the external rating of the restaurant, but as a means to gather likes of an individual.  This is easy and more customers would rate the businesses in turn.  They can then use this information to have the ultimate "lookalike" recommendation engine.  This is far more powerful than anything Google or Facebook can do.

Targeted Ads and Data

With this lookalike system in place, Yelp can then sell back to the businesses in the form of ads and data.  Since they will have information on all the buyers who are interacting with Yelp, not just the people who take the time to write a review, Yelp can then sell all the information about the customers back to the businesses for a fee.  The ads can then become more targeted because advertisers can get on the home screen of the app with a customer that is highly likely to enjoy the businesses offerings.  As customers see the recommendations are more accurate and they enjoy the businesses experiences, they will end up buying more items through Yelp advertising because of the accuracy.  This will drive higher ad prices for Yelp and bigger returns for the business as they can attract customers that will become more loyal.

I would love the opportunity to innovate at Yelp.  They are in such a unique position to do something different, but they are building the exact same monetary offerings as their competition.  The problem is they don't have the scale.  Just like Twitter, they have to be better and more accurate with their advertising.  This will drive advertising dollars their way because it is more efficient spend and that is what advertisers are looking to achieve.

Is Loyalty Boring Customers?

Found an interesting article from September 2014 from Caroline Papadatos which discusses the gamification of loyalty programs.  It really gets the mind going, because I think the gasification side is not data driven enough and the opposite is true from the data side.

A few weeks ago, I had the privilege of judging the 2014 LoyaltyGames, an incredible week-long global challenge involving 1,500 practitioners and students from 102 countries, with 15 judges who were remarkably, never in the same room nor on the same continent.

The 2014 contest had three components: awareness building, game design and loyalty building.  The game experiences were clever and fun, and I was won over by the sheer creative genius of the contest submissions. The loyalty component was straightforward: reward and recognize customer / donor tiers without breaking the bank. With a gamification spin, it meant solving a conventional customer engagement problem with an unconventional tool set. Sounds simple enough, but as I scanned case submissions looking for earn ratios and attainability models, all I could find were badges, likes, certificates and pins.

It is fascinating how much badges and pins can get people excited.  The basis of these games has a lot of merit, but what I have a problem with is the same with social media as a channel, it is not targeted at all.  There's no meat behind the game.

My answer came from Gabe Zichermann who in a recent eight-part gamification series in COLLOQUY Magazine makes the bold statement that “loyalty isn’t fun enough anymore” and our customers are bored. Gabe clearly has a point – loyalty now competes for attention in a world where Angry Birds has been downloaded two billion times. It gets worse. At the LoyaltyGames award ceremony, a renowned gamification expert accused loyalty programs of “bribing” their customers. Now my back is up, but are we outraged or outdated? 

The truth is that loyalty programs need a shot in the arm, and while experience design always has a place in the loyalty tool set, few data practitioners are charming or entertaining. And gaming is not just for Millennials. The average social gamer is a 43-year-old-woman, which just happens to be the primary target market for grocers, drugstores and a host of other retailers. So why aren’t loyalty practitioners flocking to gaming? 

I totally agree, loyalty programs need a shot in the arm.  As I have written before, most people engaging with loyalty programs are just taking the free stuff, theres very little loyalty or behavior being driven from them.  It is fascinating to combine the rich data from the loyalty programs to the fun concepts in gamification to create a targeted loyalty gamification model.  I think this would work extremely well.

I could imagine a program where certain behaviors are awarded more points and a bounce back offer could include multiple point thresholds for buying everything in a market basket analysis.  So if the customer who usually buys a TV also buys cables, programmable remotes and a blue-ray player, the customer will get multipliers if these are purchased in the next 2 months.  This gives some fun to the loyalty program, while driving the behavior to purchase items that are typically purchased with TV's.  The best of both worlds.

There’s no doubt that loyalty programs lose their luster when they became overly programmatic, but where gaming meets transactional data analysis and customer behavior change, there are notable exceptions. BrandLoyalty’s Instant Loyalty Programs in Europe, Asia and South America have a huge fun-factor for retail shoppers – on the surface they’re a widely popular collectible game for children but there is a financial underpinning that drives incremental spend, participation and superior financial performance based on maximum turnover & transactions from family households.

Whether you’re pro-loyalty or gamification, you can certainly agree with Gabe on this: “taking something that’s crummy and putting some game frosting on it won’t magically change your customer”. But let’s face it, the mix of gaming techniques and data-driven loyalty can only be good for business. And be honest, if you were given the choice of getting on a plane for yet another industry slideshow or signing up for a multi-player gaming challenge, which would you choose?

Perfect combination, a shot in the arm.  The technology exists, lets gamify our programs.  This is what I have been harping on about for a month.  These are the types of things that create great customer experiences.    

The James Hotel Combines Beauty and Elite Customer Experience for its Loyalty Guests

Mark Johnson from Loyalty360.com writes:

The James is redefining luxury boutique hotels in New York, Chicago and soon in West Hollywood for its loyal guests. The hotel focuses on providing beautiful designs and outstanding customer service.

Lisa Zandee, Senior Vice President of Brand Management, told Loyalty360 that The James is a leader in creating design and guest centric services. “Both are extremely important,” she explained. “It’s about form and function. It has to work and look good.”

An interesting interview with the Senior Vice President of Brand for the boutique chain.  Many of the points Zandee brings up are very true to run a successful hospitality operation, especially in the high-end boutique industry.  Customer service and differentiated experiences are the key for these types of properties to thrive.  Being a small hotel allows for personalized service which is the definition of a boutique experience.  

Where I think problems will start to occur is the lack of respect for data in driving decisions.  Zandee dismisses data as something that clouds the teams judgement when developing initiatives.  I think this will come back to haunt this team.  Again, there is an art and science to marketing in the digital age and The James is disregarding the science portion.  Creating a loyal database is key to surviving in the hospitality industry and solely relying on social media and your loyalty rewards program is leaving profit on the table.  

Most CRM programs make the most money from customers who aren't giving you the loyalty you are looking for, so to minimize this group can lead to reservations coming through less profitable and less loyal channels.  Increasing the base of the business coming from known customers increases profits while enabling control of the customer experience.  Delivering great customer experiences in the digital age relies on data as an important component.