9 ways to boost customer loyalty with Marketing Automation

I'm not a big fan of the lists, but it makes it convenient to talk about a few of the concepts.  Marketing automation is a very important tool for the digital marketer.  I will even go as far as saying it should be the center of the digital marketing universe.  Because digital marketing grew up as being web, this is not a popular view among digital marketers, but that doesn't mean it's not true.  

Gathering knowledge allows to build relationship: the more you know about customers, the more relevant offers you can address. Personalization is impossible without advanced behavioral and transactional analytics.

Marketing automation starts and ends with data.  Data is the basis for running any marketing automation tool.  Without a good data collection and architecture strategy, marketing automation will be hampered to a degree.  It also ends with data because the capturing of the behavior driven informs the next decision.  It is cyclical as far as data collection is concerned.

1:1 Marketing. Dynamic content and e-mails are the base of long-lasting bond with customer, because they show that you treat him individually and adjust offers to his/her particular needs. Also find opportunities to say thank you to them, ask for opinions and suggest complementary products

1-to-1 marketing is the dream.  To cost effectively do this is still farther out, but we are getting close.  The problem becomes content.  To effectively market to each person in the database is unrealistic, but start at the top.  What would it take to market to the top 10% of the database on a 1-to-1 basis.  Start from there and then try to go farther into the customer base.  

Use analytics to improve content quality: with content marketing you can not only educate your customers, but also discuss values you share, what is crucial for establishing loyalty. 30% of customers say that shared values are one of 3 top reasons for being loyal to a brand. Hence invest in content and optimize it. Read more about content marketing and marketing automation synergy.

Good content can be scary for marketers.  The time and effort to create such content is time consuming and costly, especially in the form of man hours.  It is also hard to quantify the results, which normally don't start to materialize for many months.  However, great content builds a relationship with the brand.  Storytelling and guides for customers help them relate to the brand better than most advertising.  Let the analytics guide the decision.  If customers are buying bathroom products from Home Depot, don't send them content about building a fence.  A great timed "how to" on bathroom design could go a long way to loyalty and upsell opportunities.

Measure: don’t just repeat common knowledge that making actual user buy is 7 times cheaper that bringing new one. Use advanced analytics offered by Marketing Automation Systems to measure ROI of your loyalty improving actions, and optimize them.

The crucial part to any marketing automation strategy, how are you going to measure the results?  This thought process usually comes at the end, but it should start at the beginning of your marketing automation journey.  The first thing your boss will ask after the marketing automation system goes live is "how are we doing"?  You need to not only be able to answer his questions, but you need to answer that question for yourself.  Marketing automation campaigns are living and breathing entities.  They are never finished and they need to continually evolve.  The only way to determine the evolution is by understanding the results.  

How To Win Customers Without Data-Driven Marketing

The human element – even for online businesses – always shapes the final judgment on customer retention and acquisition.

This is the exact reason why becoming a customer-driven organization is so important, even in the age of data-driven marketing.  In most cases a human interaction will determine whether customers remain loyal or churn.  This is part of the customer experience, just as much as delivering the right content to individuals to drive the desired behavior.  While data-driven marketing can handle most customer experience, for offline businesses and even online businesses, the human interaction is critical to handling the cases where things don't quite go as well as you hoped.  

The morale of this story is: make sure that your employees are your strongest, most amazing asset because the most sophisticated technology or data-driven marketing can’t replace what your employees can deliver – caring, thoughtful, on-the-spot customer happiness.

Period. Full stop.

here is so much talk about who owns the customer experience and why CMO's are reluctant to own the entire experience.  In this article the letter describes the interaction with Terry from the call-center.  Now this interaction is as much part of the brand as an advertisement driving a customer to a website or in-store.  This experience defines the brand, yet the overall person in charge of this is not the CMO, it is more than likely an callcenter manager that reports up through an operations division.  

This is where the customer-driven organization has to be a culture, not an individual.  It doesn't matter what the position title is, there is no one person that can be the customer advocate throughout large organizations.  The customer advocate has to be all employees, period.  There could be a person leading the charge, but until an organization has changed its culture to be truly customer-centric, data-driven marketing and great advertisement will never drive the most ROI possible because the organization is not focusing on the customer experience as a whole.  

For data-driven marketing to succeed doesn't need a customer-centric organization, there is a lot of value and areas to increase revenue.  My belief is all organizations should be customer-centric, this enhances all aspects of the business, not just the data-driven marketing side.

The State and Drivers of Data Marketing

What matters most is the optimization of the customer experience, relevance and (perceived) customer value as a driver of business value. Data-driven marketing certainly is not (just) about advertising and programmatic ad buying as some believe. Nor is it just about campaigns. On the contrary: if done well, data-driven marketing is part of digital marketing transformations whereby connecting around the customer across the customer life cycle is key.

Very succinct vision of what data-driven marketing is, it's all about the customer experience.  The advent of "big data" was nothing more than gathering extra data about the customers.  Gathering data is only the first step of the process, albeit a time-consuming one.  The good news is after the hard work of gathering the data has been completed, the harder part starts.  Once you have data, making sense of the data and creating actionable outcomes to enhance the customer experience becomes the goal.  This is very hard work.  It takes plenty of analysis and insight to reach this goal.  But the companies who will do this the best will be the ones that succeed in the digital age.

Among the key takeaways of the data-driven marketing report by the GlobalDMA:

• 77% of marketers are confident in the data-driven approach and 74% expect to increase data marketing budgets this year.

• Data efforts by far focus on offers, messages and content (marketing) first (69% of respondents). Second ranks a data-driven strategy or data-driven product development. Customer experience optimization unfortunately only ranks third with 49% of respondents.

• Among the key drivers of increased data marketing: first of all a need to be more customer-centric (reported by 53% of respondents). Maximizing efficiency and return ranks second followed by gaining more knowledge of customers and prospects.

I believe the first step in the process is understanding where the puck is going to be and skate in that direction.  Marketers are understanding this data revolution is coming and they are saying the right things in surveys.  The real question will be how to get there.  It's easy to identify problems, it's hard to implement solutions.  The marketers who will show they are adept at change will thrive in this new paradigm.  

Customer analytics is something I have focused my entire career.  In the casino industry we have had the optimal opt-in mechanism for many years and have collected amazing amounts of data about our customers behavior.  We have used this to create targeted marketing campaigns to our customers, so I believe in the direction the entire industry is taking.  Always start with the customer.  It will lead to creating better experiences and more profitable results.

 

How Not To Use Marketing Automation

Normally I would never suggest not using a marketing automation for anything, but it is a funny title so I'll let this slide.  I would even argue that bad marketing automation is better than no marketing automation, but not by much.

Generic Broadcasting – The time that you save with marketing automation should be used to not only improve your content in the first place, but also to personalise through segmentation. Consumers in all market places are becoming more and more sophisticated, and can spot poorly executed marketing automation. And their perception is likely to be that you don’t care about the communication.

This is the first step of marketing automation.  So many times the implementation strategy of the marketers installing the new system is to do what they are currently doing, but in a new fancy tool.  I think this is an okay step if the desired outcome is to QA the output to make sure all the data is correctly hooked up.  Other than that, marketers should have an understanding of what the new capabilities of the tool they have purchased and at least start with a few general segments to make sure there are some differentiation in the messaging.

My advice is to bring in a group that has experience in the tool who focuses on the strategy behind utilizing the tool to help build a roadmap.  It's okay to start broad, in fact I recommend it.  But don't tart from scratch.  Start implementing the "low hanging fruit" opportunities in your business right away.  This will be your baseline and then you start to grow from there.

Being A Spammer – Automated emails are a great way of engaging with recipients who have shown an interest in your email, but you should still spend time focusing on the quality of your communication. Avoid the usual spam trigger words and don’t go sending an email to thousands of people all at the same time. Marketing automation can increase the risk of spam, but a good email provider will help you with this.

All the good Email Service Providers (ESP) will provide services to assist you in "warming up" your domain to the Internet Service Providers (ISP).  This is a necessary first step to make sure everyone can see your emails when you send them (deliverability %).  

However, this does not mean your job is over.  If you decide automation will allow you to send emails to your customers everyday with messages which do not resonate with most of them, you will quickly be flagged as spam.  If this happens too many times, the ISP's will block your emails.  When I started at one property, Yahoo was blocking all the emails and the deliverability rating was in the high 60% range.  It took a long time to get unblocked, so make sure your content is relevant and you stop sending to customers that are not opening your email.

Bad Time Automating – Automated communications are tricky: you’re writing them at a time where the context of how the communication will be received isn’t known. Most of the time, this is absolutely fine as you are only scheduling a few hours ahead, but beware of shifting events. 

Most of the time your emails will not be "set it and forget it".  You may run with an automated email blast for customers that signed up today with an offer to engage further, and that is fine in most cases.  In a lot of the cases the automation is used to increase the segmentation capabilities, not to create a generic email blast to all your customers over and over again.  

If you run into this problem of timing, then forget about scheduling too far in advance.  Take your time and make sure the message is relevant to the customer at the time the email is sent.  This will save you from looking like someone that doesn't understand the customer at all.  That is the worst thing that could happen.

Communicating Constantly – With marketing automation, communications with your audience should become a lot easier. But don’t get carried away. If it is easier, then the temptation will be to communicate more often, but this is as off-putting for a recipient as communicating poorly. It can also have a detrimental effect on the size of your audience.

The quickest way to being marked as spam or unsubscribed is to over communicate through email.  Just because its easier to do, doesn't mean you should.  Make sure you are communicating a little more than your customer is engaging with your brand.  Its okay to communicate everyday if your customer is buying something everyday, but this is usually not the case.  If your customer purchases a product once a month, maybe every other week is a good cadence to start.  Remember, the beauty of a marketing automation tool is your customers don't have to all be on the same communication cadence, they can be on their own, as long a you have enough content to make that strategy make sense.

Send And Forget – One of the objectives of most communications is to elicit a response. Whether that is an open from an email, a click on an advert or a reply / share from a social media post. So when you are automating, you should always have a process in place for monitoring their impact – you should be able to set this up as an email or smart phone notification. Ignoring this can result in recipients not talking (positively or negatively) to anyone, something to avoid at all costs.

As I said above, this strategy can be detrimental to having a marketing automation tool.  Never send without analyzing the results.  All marketing automation campaigns are living and breathing entities, they need to be changed and enhanced constantly, because as you change behaviors the communication cadence and the offers need to change with it.  There are also segments of customers in the campaign who are not getting what you are throwing out, so constantly look for opportunities to enhance the campaigns taking these customers into account.  Analyzing is the most important step of the process.

Why CEOs Say Yes to Marketing Automation

Ten short years ago, it was rare for a company to have a marketing automation platform in place. Since then, it’s become ever more clear that acquiring marketing automation (and applying the expertise to make it hum) is a huge competitive differentiator. SiriusDecisions research indicates that 80% of the organizations with the highest-performing demand waterfalls (based on the number of won deals per 1,000 inquiries) have implemented marketing automation platforms. This tallies with other research; the 2015 report “Rethinking the Role of Marketing” from Gleanster and Act-On found that Top Performers were 20% more likely than the average organization to use marketing automation technology..

I think it is still rare for most organizations to have a marketing automation platform, but what is even more rare are companies who are taking advantage of their platform.  The promise of marketing automation is very enticing as this article articulates.  The benefits of a well-run marketing automation program is an extreme competitive advantage.

1. Marketing Automation Lets You Put the Customer in the Center of Your World.

List management. Marketing automation lets makes it easier to segment your lists by field values (explicit data such as title, department, industry, company size) and by implicit, inferred factors (often actions) such as web pages visited, eBooks downloaded, emails clicked on. It also lets you sync chosen data back and forth with a CRM system.

Well beyond the realm of salespeople, marketing automation lets you manage your customer base on a level of personalization that is not possible otherwise.  Some say these platforms make the relationships with customers less personal, but that is a fallacy.  With the amount of personalization and targeting capable with these platforms, the customer gets a more personalized experience with marketing automation.  

The amount of time manual processes take to manage the customer, it is impossible for these processes to really give the best experience to the customer.  There is just not enough time in the day.  However, a marketing automation platform can create customized communications based on all of the data described above, including behavioral information, geo aware messaging and preferences of communication channels.

Campaign management. Automated programs can save time (which is money, yes) and take a little human error out of your programs. You can set them up to replicate successful lead nurturing or onboarding programs, for example, and they will run exactly as programmed, no matter who misses work on Tuesday. You can add prospects as they enter your world (perhaps through a form) and exit them (perhaps to another program, or to sales) as you learn more about them, or as they become increasingly qualified. You can set up trigger emails (thank-yous, congratulations, expiring trials) and landing pages that make offers or fulfill requests, showing how responsive you are.

Campaign management is a difficult process if you have different programs pulling lists, then fulfilling communications and measuring results.  The amount of time saved by having a platform where everything is integrated and can trigger off the behavior of the customer is very powerful.

6. Marketing Automation Takes Care of the Established Customer

The platform gives you a structure you can scale in your retention strategy. Start with using a nurturing educational strategy to support onboarding. Move on to keeping your customers in the loop, educating them about new features, showing them new plays with old features, and keeping them abreast of changes in the industry that affect them. Take the same techniques you use to notice when a lead is warming up and apply them to noticing when a customer is looking at an upsell … or needs attention to prevent churn.

Retention is the most important part of the database.  The greater the number of sales coming from your established customer base allows for the greatest growth in your business.  Marketing automation at its heart is best for the established customers.  The platform is designed to drive more business from this segment.  Since the majority of most companies revenue comes from loyal customers, having the ability to grow this groups sales is essential to a longterm stable business model.  The marketing automation platform should be at the center of this model.

7. Marketing Automation Spurs Revenue and Growth

These benefits are all pieces of a puzzle that every company using marketing automation puts together in its own unique way. The common denominator is that most companies that apply marketing automation – whether they use every feature or just the basics – will see faster growth and post more top-line revenue.

Well who doesn't want that?

How CMOs Can Make Sure Their Companies Are Customer-Obsessed

CMOs are charged with making their companies customer-obsessed — so they can win in an age where customers are highly empowered. But the irony is that many marketing shops themselves are not customer-obsessed.

I am continually thinking about the customer-centric approach and who should own it in the organization.  The CMO is the obvious choice, however are they the best choice?  I have seen where organizations have a C-level position, something to the tune of Chief Customer Officer.  This is also thought because it ends up being another level in the organization, another potential touchpoint in the organization that has to bring different groups in the organization together around one common goal.  I think it comes down to having the right person.

Marketers are predisposed to think about the market first. So why are marketers not naturally predisposed to be customer-obsessed? The answer lies in gravity — the gravity of the P&L and the associated product, solution or service performance.

It's always about the customer.  Everything should come back to customer analytics.  I think Finance departments have too much power in some organizations where high-level KPI's are all about a product or a service.  The problem with these KPI's is they don't go far enough down to the "people" who are driving those metrics.  It is similar to fixing a symptom instead of the actual source of the problem.

For example, the company sells 1,000,000 widgets and they want to grow this by 3% in the next quarter.  This is the entire wrong approach to the problem.  Widgets don't grow by 3%.  3% more customers buy widgets in the quarter.  It is imperative to start with the customer because they are the ones that are purchasing these widgets.  So to grow those numbers, marketers need to embrace the customers to grow their numbers.

I have spoken with many CMOs — across industries and geographies — and this common theme has emerged: Marketing’s relevance and performance is now predicated on putting the customer at the center of the universe. This is neither elective nor minor surgery. Most believe an overhaul — not a simple refinement — is needed to make marketing customer-obsessed and truly able to drive growth.

Changing to a customer-centric organization is a complete change in culture.  This does not happen overnight.  It takes a dedicated team with a singular focus many months to accomplish.  I once read to change a culture, a great organization with amazing focus will take 18 months.  There are not that many of these organizations out there.  The average is 4 years.  So organizations need to start their culture change today.  There is no time to waste.  The customer-obsessed organization will be the most successful in the new customer empowered buying dynamic.  

The App Store is in Trouble Without Paid Upgrades

I want to preface this by saying I am not an app developer, however I have watched the app store and Apple for a long time now.  I have also lead very successful digital marketing teams for billion dollar revenue companies, so I know a thing or two about marketing ad driving revenue for products and services.  

Ever since the app store was introduced in 2008 it has been a boon for many developers, but more and more I hear their revenues are down even though the app store as a whole is up.  I hear a lot of complaints about the app store is geared to only help the top grossing apps or the apps Apple wants to help.  All of this is true, it is hard to find the app you want in the app store and their curation definitely has some favoritism happening, but that's business.  These are problems that still need to be solved, but the biggest problem in my eyes is the lack of paid upgrades.

Being a consumer of apps I have enjoyed the lack of paid upgrades, it allows me to reap the benefits from the app for a long time.  However, I paid for Instapaper 6 years ago and I have not paid a dime since, this is not a good model for the app developers.  I am a loyal customer, but I don't need the upgrades that come with the monthly fee, which I think is spending too much for the extras.

Loyal customers are the best source of additional revenue

For any business to thrive, they have to be able to establish a base of business that provides the bulk of the revenue.  This is the loyal customer base that equates to 70-80% of the revenue, but accounts for only 30-50% of the investment in advertising and marketing.  These are the customers that love the products, tell all their friends about the products and buy new products when available.  This is why Apple is crushing their competition because they have a loyal base of customers that buy new products from Apple when available.

For app developers, without a model for paid upgrades, they are forced into a model of perpetually finding new customers or create a subscription type model.  For game developers this is fine, because they can create an experience that is easier and more enjoyable for the gamer when purchasing extra coins to make getting through levels faster.  People are willing to pay for these and that is great.  For the indie app developer making polished apps, this model does not work.  For that reason, they are constantly trying to find another customer who will buy their app for $2.99 and then forget about them.  This is not a sustainable business model.  Eventually there are not enough customers to buy the new app to make a living.  As more people buy the app, the less people there are to buy the app in the pool, so it is inevitable that revenues will not be maintained.

Beautiful apps will become fewer and far between

The Apple app store is filled with a lot of garbage, but it is also filled with amazing apps.  Apps that developers have put their heart and soul into.  Even back in the days of only the Mac, an application on that platform was much nicer than applications on the PC.  This is a trend that continued on iOS and continues to this day.  But that may all change soon.

A developer has to feel confident they will get a return on their investment for the time they put into an app.  There are never certainties in this business, but someone who takes pride in what they build will always take the time needed to make it beautiful, functional and have the best customer experience possible.  If there is not a business model that seems viable, the developer is then forced to create many apps or develop for multiple platforms to succeed.  This limits their time.  Limited time results in less polished, less amazing apps.  This hurts the app store.  This hurts Apples platform.

Paid Upgrades is a superior app business model

Paid upgrades give the app developer the opportunity to continue to work on their app while making money from current loyal customers and new customers alike.  This is a sustainable business model.  It is also a business model that will create and maintain amazing apps.  So many developers have created great apps and made very good money, only to see the app become less and less updated over time leaving the customer with the same experience they had 5 years ago. 

A paid upgrade model will allow developers to build apps that they want in their heart to build, continue to improve that app, while having a revenue stream that supports the added development work.  This will result in apps that have longer shelf lives.  Imagine if this model existed and Marco Arment was still toying with Instapaper because their was a revenue stream that could sustain the business?  Developers like him and many others would continually improve and push the envelope of what their apps can do.  All this would cost the customer $3.99 a year, or every other year, or whenever the developer decided the upgrades to the app warranted an upgrade?  And if the customer didn't want to upgrade, that's fine, they can stay with an older version.   

I would like to see Apple adopt this model.  I know app developers have been begging for years, but I am an app consumer that is now begging.  I don't want amazing, innovative apps to go away.  I want apps where developers spend many hours toying with the customer experience until it is just right.  Where they obsess over every little detail because they know their most loyal customers will remain loyal because of that obsession.  Where they create the next "pull to refresh" because they know there is a better way.  

I don't want to live within a platform where the developers don't improve upon their original design because it is not worth the effort from a revenue perspective.  Please Apple, just for us app consumers.

Great Brand Apps Create Loyal Happy Customers

Mobile apps are the way we will interact with all of our loyalty programs in the digital age.  Smartphone apps can do so much more than a piece of plastic or punchcard could have ever imagined, yet so many companies have built half-baked, poorly thought out attempts at creating a customer experience.  But the good news is there are some leaders that are nailing it.

The 4 qualities a mobile app should possess are:

A mechanism to capture transactions 

At the heart of the mobile experience should be the mechanism to capture data about the customer.  This data should feed into the loyalty program of the brand.  This should come in the form of transactional, interests, surveys and geo location data.  Data is the building block for a loyalty program to succeed.  

Frictionless transactions

A mobile app has the ability to eliminate the frictions of the transaction.  For example, at an Apple Store the customer can enter the store, open the app, scan the item they would like to purchase and then leave the store, all without having to interact with a human or wait in line.  That is eliminating friction.

A mechanism to communicate with your customers

Mobile is a channel.  It is perhaps the most important channel in the new digital marketing era.  The phone is always on your customers body and that will soon include wearables.  The ability to push messages to your customers through this channel is extremely important.  The ability for your customer to open the app and see their loyalty program details makes communicating with your customer more personal than ever before.  This includes beacon support to guide the customer through the offline experience as well.  This should be the channel that receives the most focus in the coming years.

An engaging experience without a transaction

Mobile apps hold a space on the customers phone.  If you make your app engaging, even when the customer is not making a transaction with you, you may keep a good position on the phone.  Think of it as search rankings, the more prominent position, the more engagement with your brand.  Get stuck in a folder on the third page, you will only be utilized as a mechanism for transactions which is not the worst thing in the world, but doesn't drive behavior. 

Starbucks has been on the forefront in the mobile app space since it introduced its mobile app in 2011.  Starbucks took the approach of creating an app that engages customers when not in a Starbucks, along with making the transaction process frictionless.  Starbucks has long partnered with Apple by giving away free music and apps, but they also moved this functionality to the app.  By doing this, Starbucks has been able to engage their customers with their application outside of the brick and mortar stores.  I consistently look at my badges from Starbucks to see what free apps or music they are giving away this week.  Most of the time I don't get the freebies because they are not to my liking, but every once in awhile I do.  But it also has trained me to constantly go to the app.  I check my points and how far away I am for a free award and I am not even a big free award kind of a guy.

Starbucks has also made a frictionless payment process that also tracks my behavior.  I always received gift cards from Starbucks and had them strewn all over the place.  Some made it to the wallet, some were in drawers, but they were never consolidated.  Starbucks also had a loyalty program that was tied into a gift card, but it was confusing on how to interact with the program when I wasn't using that particular gift card.  Plus having to manually add money to the specific gift card was far from frictionless.  So I never really used the loyalty program and I was going to Starbucks less.  The app has removed all of this friction.  It is easy to transfer gift card money to the main loyalty account, which was a main pain point for me.  It also allowed for easy addition of funds into the card through the app.  These two items made using the program much easier.  

The other app that I have been very impressed with is the Chipotle app.  This app is a little different from the Starbucks app because it is just solving one problem, waiting in line.  The app allows you to place a Chipotle order and skip the line to pick it up at a designated time.  Now I don't know if any of you have been in a Chipotle and have to wait in the line to order, but it could be a fifteen minute exercise in browsing Twitter.  The app saves your favorites and recents so it takes approximately 20 seconds to place an order.  Pay online, just walk to the cashier and they hand you your bag of goodness and you are off.  Simple, frictionless and awesome.   

Improvements can be made in both of these apps to include more of the 4 qualities.  The Starbucks app nails 3 out of the 4, but can do a better job at using the app as a personal, targeted channel.  Right now the offers they have are not very tailored to my experience.  This is a big opportunity to make the app even more engaging.  For Chipotle, they only possess 1 out of the 4.  They might be monitoring my transactions, but they don't have a loyalty program tied to the app, so I am not sure.  The app is a great start, but they could hit a home run with the addition of some functionality.  Either way, I will still use it weekly to avoid the lines.

Keeping Up With Today’s Loyalty Demands

Originally posted on IBM’s Smarter Commerce blog:

Loyalty marketing is more and more prominent in today’s retail landscape. It is becoming common knowledge that customer acquisition costs are increasingly rising, and data-driven customer retention is a key area filled with untapped growth potential. But loyalty marketing is evolving and is more intricate than just offering discounts to existing customers. As many marketers realize, there are three common problems that they run into when trying to implement an effective loyalty program:

1. They often feel stuck offering dollars-off discounts and are losing their margins without sustainably changing their customer behavior.

2. Personalization is not going further than using much more than a first and last name, and is not connecting to the customer and building customer relationships.

3. Their loyalty members are not actively participating and being engaged, and consequently not influencing long term results.

It is a buyers market as they would say in the real-estate business.  Customers have the ability to buy from a multitude of companies with fairly frictionless transactions.  Years ago, a customer would be limited to their location to buy many of the items they can now purchase online, which makes loyalty marketing a much harder task today.  If the customer does not like an experience they have with your company, the friction to switch providers is much easier than in the past.

This has led to a race to the bottom with most companies.  Instead of competing on differentiation, companies rely on sales and discounting to compete in this new world.  Relying on discounts is not differentiated at all.  Any competitor can match a price or beat the price if they are willing to decrease their margins for the business.  As I wrote in Busy is Not a Strategy, many of your competitors will look at metrics like volume as their key metric which will force them to decrease margins and hurt your business.  

Increasing Self-Identification

Loyalty incentivizes customers to provide more information about themselves and engage across channels, which leads to a richer understanding of your customers and how they interact with your brand. You may be surprised how many of them are open to providing information about themselves in order to receive more relevant communications and offers.

Spending most of my time in the casino industry has shown me that consumers willingly give away information in return for a richer experience.  In the case of the casinos this comes in the form of comps, but in other industries this does not have to be a giveaway.  This could be access to sales, in the case of grocery stores.  Find out what your version of the comp is to increase customer self-identification.  It may start off as a giveaway, but don't let it drive the future customer experiences with that customer.  

Taking Personalization to the Next Level

In addition to increasing customer self-identification, you should track and analyze metrics such as order frequency, average order value, and from which channels customers are purchasing. Modern loyalty programs gather this customer data and provide a centralized hub which is used to personalize meaningful incentives and rewards for higher customer redemption and satisfaction, and also to send personalized messages. These messages can be targeted towards specific actions and customer segments, and are used to maintain relevance and build upon customer-brand relationships by making customers feel like you are paying attention to what they want.

If you aren't tracking the purchases of your customers then you aren't going to be successful in loyalty marketing.  Creating meaningful customer experiences relies on gaining insight to the behavior of the customer.  By getting the customer to opt-in, it allows the business to create the true value from the loyalty program as I wrote here.  Targeted content will create meaningful customer experiences and this rich data is at the core.  

Cohesive Omni-Channel Capabilities

With today’s consumer having the ability to interact with your brand across all channels, it is essential to have cohesive communication, connectivity of data, and customer access to your program and rewards at all touch points. Different consumers like to interact with brands through different channels – whether in-store, social media, or email – and your program should be available in their preferred channel.

Providing the same experience for the customer, no matter what channel they are using, is the key to creating meaningful customer experiences.  This is the hard part of the new customer experience paradigm.  Keeping the content and messaging across channels in an online and offline world can be complex, but is very rewarding.  Customers don't care that different divisions in the company have different responsibilities and the online team doesn't communicate effectively with the operations team.  Customers expect their experience to be seamless across channels and it is imperative that businesses adjust to create this seamless customer experience. 

The Slow Decline of Companies

In Seth Godin's latest blog he mentions how company's almost always melt, they rarely explode. It is almost always the short-term thinking of today that causes the crisis of tomorrow. 

Rarely in the moment, when business is down and your customers are no longer engaged can a corporation look back and find the reason. That's because it's multiple little reasons that were made in years past for short-term gains that lost the customers trust. 

Trust in a personal relationship is hard to regain, but trust in a consumer to business relationship is almost impossible to regain. 

Three Myths about What Customers Want →

Most marketers think that the best way to hold onto customers is through "engagement" — interacting as much as possible with them and building relationships. It turns out that that's rarely true.

Myth #1: Most consumers want to have relationships with your brand.

Actually, they don't. Only 23% of the consumers in our study said they have a relationship with a brand. In the typical consumer's view of the world, relationships are reserved for friends, family and colleagues.

The debate about whether social media and brands can really co-exist.  Do customers really want a message from a brand right after viewing new baby pictures of their niece?  These may be separated out in the future, a la foursquare.  ​

Myth #2: Interactions build relationships.

No, they don't. Shared values build relationships. A shared value is a belief that both the brand and consumer have about a brand's higher purpose or broad philosophy. For example, Pedigree Dog Food's shared value is a belief that every dog deserves a loving home. Southwest Airlines' shared value revolves around the democratization of air travel.

Customers can turn on a dime.  Southwest has such a loyal following because they made traveling something for the rest of us.  Brands like Apple bring people in to what they can do with their devices and how it can enhance ones life.   ​

Myth #3: The more interaction the better.

Wrong. There's no correlation between interactions with a customer and the likelihood that he or she will be "sticky" (go through with an intended purchase, purchase again, and recommend). Yet, most marketers behave as if there is a continuous linear relationship between the number of interactions and share of wallet.

This I have seen time and time again.  It amazes me how many emails I get from large brands on a daily, sometimes more than a daily basis.  ​I start to ignore these emails, as they tend to start offering the same thing over and over.  Even for large retail brands, there are only a few items that they can target to my specific wants and needs, so many communications will see my interest wane.  Make communications worth opening, it is much better to send an email that the customer will always open than an email they may just delete because they don't have time or they have become immune to too many communications.